تجزیه و تحلیل آماری بیومارکرهای خونی و کلیوی در بیماران شیمی درمانی از طریق اعتبارسنجی توسط هوش مصنوعی
کد: G-1589
نویسندگان: Mohammad Amin Abdolahi Ziaaldini ℗, Mahtab Sayadi *, Rasta Farhadi, Nazgol Nourafshan
زمان بندی: زمان بندی نشده!
برچسب: سیاست گذاری، قانون گذاری و مدیریت سلامت در حوزه هوش مصنوعی
دانلود: دانلود پوستر
خلاصه مقاله:
خلاصه مقاله
Background and aims: In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning have increasingly influenced medical data analysis. While AI tools like ChatGPT Plus, Grok3, and DeepSeek have emerged, the use of traditional software such as SPSS, Prism, and Matlab has declined due to AI’s ability to generate more extensive outputs. This study presents a validation framework for AI tools in analyzing statistical data from cancer patients undergoing treatment, and assessing their ability to process biochemical and hematological parameters. Method: This study examined 457 chemotherapy patients. Urea and creatinine levels were categorised as normal or abnormal, with creatinine also classified by gender. Platelet (Plt), hemoglobin (Hb), and white blood cell (WBC) counts were analyzed within their normal and abnormal ranges. Statistical analyses were first conducted using Prism (version 10.4.1) and then replicated using AI-based platforms, including ChatGPT Plus, Grok3, DeepSeek, Poe, Perplexity, Gemini, Monica, and Sciences. However, only ChatGPT Plus, Grok3, and DeepSeek provided relevant statistical outputs. The results from these three AI tools were compared with Prism to evaluate consistency and reliability. Results: An independent t-test was performed, assuming a Gaussian distribution with equal standard deviation. Comparison of P-values across different tools showed varying agreement with Prism. Results for Prism versus DeepSeek: Plt = 0.1347, Hb = 0.4754, WBC = 0.0512. Prism versus Grok3: Plt = 0.7409, Hb = 0.6573, WBC = 0.4584, indicating Grok3’s closer alignment with Prism. ChatGPT Plus demonstrated near-perfect agreement (P-Value 0.999), producing identical results to Prism. Conclusion: The study indicates that ChatGPT Plus, with its high accuracy and results comparable to Prism, can be a suitable alternative. Grok3 also performed well, but DeepSeek showed weakness in WBC measurement and was less reliable. AI tools are emerging as effective alternatives to statistical software, but their accuracy in specific variables should be independently validated.
کلمات کلیدی
Comparative analysis, AI, Patient Markers, Chemotherapy
